MootJP (2020): 発表

ID :

Original submission元の投稿 :

発表の題名: A Study of the Recent Increase in Kyoto Institute of Technology (KIT) Administrative Staff using Moodle

発表の種類: Case study (20 mins) ケース・スタディー（２０分）

発表の言語: English 英語

発表のキーワード: administrative staff using Moodle

発表の要約: An increasing number of Kyoto Institute of Technology (KIT) administrative staff have begun using Moodle since 2015. We find their Moodle-use can be largely categorized as: a) Providing a way for faculty/staff members who are absent from on-campus training to view training videos. b) Collecting honest feedback on "Center of Community (COC), " and other KIT projects. c) Providing a way for faculty and staff to submit monthly reports and other documents. Although Moodle has increased the ease and accessibility of tasks in these three categories, we have received complaints and suggestions from administrative staff. For this reason, I think that it will be meaningful to analyze and discuss the complaints and suggestions from administrator staff, rather than faculty or students.

Title題名 :

A Study of the Recent Increase in Kyoto Institute of Technology (KIT) Administrative Staff using Moodle

Type種類 :

プレゼンテーション（２０分）

Category部類 :

個人の発表

Language言語 :

英語

Abstract要約 :

An increasing number of Kyoto Institute of Technology (KIT) administrative staff have begun using Moodle since 2015. We find their Moodle-use can be largely categorized as:

a) Providing a way for faculty/staff members who are absent from on-campus training to view training videos.

b) Collecting honest feedback on "Center of Community (COC)," and other KIT projects.

c) Providing a way for faculty and staff to submit monthly reports and other documents.

Although Moodle has increased the ease and accessibility of tasks in these three categories, we have received complaints and suggestions from administrative staff. For instance, what they are interested the most in is "how to contact those who have NOT completed activities, such as feedback module, quiz module, and assignment module." However, the contacting methods are different among these modules, which sometimes makes them annoyed. For this reason, it should be meaningful to analyze and discuss the complaints and suggestions from administrator staff, rather than faculty or students. I would like to introduce as many cases as time allows.

Keywordsキーワード :

administrative staff using Moodle

Topicsトピック :

Moodleの利用

Presentation times発表時間 :

２月２７日（木）午前##２月２７日（木）午後##２月２８日（金）午前##２月２８日（金）午後

Main presenter筆頭発表者 :

Mr. Keisuke TAMAI 玉井啓介

Affiliation所属 :

Kyoto Institute Of Technology 京都工芸繊維大学 (京都府, Japan)

EmailEメール :

tamai@kit.ac.jp

Handout資料 :

Slidesスライド :

Commentsコメント :

Added by入力ユーザ :

TAMAI Keisuke

Date added入力日付 :

2019年 10月 31日

Date modified更新日付 :

2019年 12月 14日

Message from the
Vetting Committee試査委員会からの
メッセージ :

Thanks for your submission!

Your proposal has been accepted.

Please remember to register for the conference (Presenter registrations).
Please be sure to have any co-presenters register as well.

We look forward to seeing you at the conference in February.

Peer review査読 :

Peer Review 1

Criteria	Assessment
	6 /
	8 /
	8 /
	8 /
	5 /
	40 /
	75 /

Feedback This abstract has potential, especially because it discusses staff use rather than student use. However, besides dividing the use by the staff into three categories, it is not clear what the presenter wants to present. At least a hint at the complaints/suggestions would have been useful for the audience trying to decide whether to attend the case study presentation or not.

Peer Review 2

Criteria	Assessment
	6 /
	10 /
	10 /
	10 /
	5 /
	40 /
	81 /

Feedback This strikes me as a work in progress. I would hope that some progress has been made since submission and that the abstract can be edited to reflect a more polished presentation. For example, the author writes "I think that it will be meaningful to analyze and. . . " Ideally, an abstract shouldn't have phrases a starting with "I think. . . " and the future tense of the remainder of that sentence suggests that the case study is still underway.

Peer Review 3

Criteria	Assessment
	8 /
	8 /
	9 /
	9 /
	7 /
	40 /
	81 /

Feedback The challenge of using Moodle for administration should be interesting for many participants.

Submission status処理状況 :

承認

Schedule numberスケジュール番号 :

228-P

Schedule day開催予定日 :

2月 27日 (木)

Schedule time開催予定時刻 :

15: 10 - 15: 20

Schedule duration開催予定時間 :

10 分

Schedule room name開催予定室名 :

第３号室：一文字ぐるぐる

Schedule room seats開催予定室名の坐整数 :

undefined

Schedule audience聴講予定者 :