| ID : |
|
| Original submission元の投稿 : |
発表の題名: Six reasons why U. S. higher institutions prefer Moodle over Google Classroom 発表の種類: Presentation (40 mins) プレゼンテーション（４０分） 発表の言語: English 英語 発表のキーワード: LMS, course and data management, site administration, data privacy and security, system integration 発表の要約: Although Google Classroom has been enthusiastically adopted by many American high schools, less than 4 percent of higher institutions in the U. S. use it as their primary Learning Management System (LMS), opting instead to maintain their 'closed' LMS such as Blackboard or Moodle. Why is this adoption rate among U. S. higher institutions so low? Using site screenshots, images, and slides, this presentation will outline 6 reasons why U. S higher institutes prefer using a 'closed' LMS such as Moodle over using Google Classroom. During this presentation each of these LMS platforms is analyzed in relation to their teaching effectiveness, course and data management, site administration, data privacy and security, interoperability with student information systems, and integration with other systems. There will be a question and answer time at the end of this presentation, where participants can discuss points raised, or ask for further clarification. The slide presentation will utilize a lot of images to help aid understanding of the points being discussed. |
| Title題名 : |
- Six reasons why U. S. higher institutions prefer Moodle over Google Classroom |
| Type種類 : |
プレゼンテーション（４０分） |
| Category部類 : |
個人の発表 |
| Language言語 : |
英語 |
| Abstract要約 : |
Although Google Classroom has been enthusiastically adopted by many American high schools, less than 4 percent of higher institutions in the U.S. use it as their primary Learning Management System (LMS), opting instead to maintain their 'closed' LMS such as Blackboard or Moodle. Why is this adoption rate among U.S. higher institutions so low? Using site screenshots, images, and slides, this presentation will outline 6 reasons why U.S higher institutes prefer using a 'closed' LMS such as Moodle over using Google Classroom. During this presentation each of these LMS platforms is analyzed in relation to their teaching effectiveness, course and data management, site administration, data privacy and security, interoperability with student information systems, and integration with other systems. There will be a question and answer time at the end of this presentation, where participants can discuss points raised, or ask for further clarification. The slide presentation will utilize a lot of images to help aid understanding of the points being discussed. |
| Keywordsキーワード : |
LMS, course and data management, site administration, data privacy and security, system integration |
| Topicsトピック : |
Moodleの利用 |
| Presentation times発表時間 : |
２月２７日（木）午前##２月２７日（木）午後 |
| Main presenter筆頭発表者 : |
Mr. Brian NIELSEN ニールセン ブライアン |
| Affiliation所属 : |
Hokkai School Of Commerce 北海商科大学 (Sapporo, Japan) |
| EmailEメール : |
nielsen@hokkai.ac.jp |
| Handout資料 : |
|
| Slidesスライド : |
|
| Added by入力ユーザ : |
NIELSEN Brian |
| Date added入力日付 : |
2019年 11月 8日 |
| Date modified更新日付 : |
2019年 11月 9日 |
Message from the
Vetting Committee試査委員会からの
メッセージ : |
Thanks for your submission! Your proposal has been accepted. - Please remember to register for the conference (Presenter registrations).
- Please be sure to have any co-presenters register as well.
We look forward to seeing you at the conference in February. |
| Peer review査読 : |
|
|
Peer Review 1| Criteria | Assessment |
|---|
| 8 / | | 9 / | | 9 / | | 8 / | | 9 / | | 50 / | | 93 / |
Feedback I think it is very positive that Moodle MOOT delegates are exposed to the features and capabilities of other learning platforms. Moodle competitors are not frequently discussed at the Japan MOOT, so this represents an unique opportunity. Peer Review 2| Criteria | Assessment |
|---|
| 10 / | | 10 / | | 10 / | | 8 / | | 8 / | | 45 / | | 91 / |
Feedback Although it is important to know how Moodle compares with alternate LMSs, this abstract seems to take a rather Google Classrooms centric approach. Also, Blackboard and Moodle appear to be lumped together as similar systems, though there is also a significant market share difference between them in the US and globally. Making it a little more Moodle centric may increase the relevance to moot participants. Peer Review 3| Criteria | Assessment |
|---|
| 7 / | | 4 / | | 6 / | | 6 / | | 6 / | | 15 / | | 44 / |
Feedback The focus of a Moot is to introduce the Moodle system, modifications, usage scenarios, etc. I do not understand how the content, proposed here, fits into the intended purpose of a Moodle Moot. Additionally, the use of the term "closed" is confusing. As Moodle is an Open Source package, modifiable by anyone who choses to do so, it is more often described to be "open" opposed to systems like Google Classroom that are not modifiable by the user. The overall goal of this presentation is not clear and requires serious overall to be applicable to a Moodle Moot. |
| Submission status処理状況 : |
承認 |
| Schedule numberスケジュール番号 : |
211-P |
| Schedule day開催予定日 : |
2月 27日 (木) |
| Schedule time開催予定時刻 : |
10: 20 - 10: 30 |
| Schedule duration開催予定時間 : |
10 分 |
| Schedule room name開催予定室名 : |
第２号室：いきなり団子 |
| Schedule room seats開催予定室名の坐整数 : |
undefined |
| Schedule audience聴講予定者 : |
|
|
|