- Original submission元の原稿
Presentation title: Performance Assessment: Strengths and Weaknesses of Moodle Approaches presentation_title
発表の種類: Presentation (40 mins) プレゼンテーション（４０分）
発表の言語: English 英語
発表のキーワード: Assessment, Moodle, Role-Plays
Presentation abstract: Performance presentation_abstract Performance-based assessment includes classroom-based assessment of presentations, skill demonstrations, role-plays, drama, composition, teaching/nursing practice, interviews in English language classes, and other live performances. Moodle has many tools for handling the management of these performances, The presentation will also outline the demonstrate how performance-based assessment could make use of Moodle as a main assessment tool, especially in self and peer assessment with assessment, as well as teacher assessment. One case study of a student role-play performance in a language-based classroom assessment in an English for Hotel and Tourism course, which employed Moodle as the main assessment tool, will be presented. Participants in presented with the focus on the weaknesses and strengths and weaknesses of employing Moodle as a major mode of assessment management the main assessment tool. This will include In this session may contribute case, Moodle’s tools for assessment. rubric designer was employed in the assessment process for recorded performances of two persons on zoom. This is compared with a second method where three teachers view the same performance live, record their recommendations for improving scores on a paper rubric, then transfer the grades into a Moodle assignment. We will compare both standard modules (forum, (for example, forum, workshop, assignment) and custom modules (video assessment module). This (for example, video assessment module) and give recommendations. Finally, the weaknesses of current module design will lead to factor together a brainstorm of suggestions for future application development. Format HTML format
- Peer review details査読詳細
Peer Review 1
| Criteria | Assessment |
|---|
| Clarity of Submission | 5 / 10 |
| Presentation Length | 8 / 10 |
| Originality of Submission | 7 / 10 |
| Appropriateness & Relevance to the Moot | 9 / 10 |
| Quality of Content & Writing | 6 / 10 |
| Overall evaluation | 25 / 50 |
| | 60 / 100 |
Feedback Could you add a few more details about what you will present during your session? I know you mentioned the tools that Moodle has, but will you show all of these tools? Will you compare the different assessments in each of them? I'm left wondering about that after I read it. I'm sure your presentation is appropriate and will benefit the audience, however, it would be good to give the readers more details on what you will present. Good luck with it.
Peer Review 2
| Criteria | Assessment |
|---|
| Clarity of Submission | 7 / 10 |
| Presentation Length | 5 / 10 |
| Originality of Submission | 7 / 10 |
| Appropriateness & Relevance to the Moot | 7 / 10 |
| Quality of Content & Writing | 8 / 10 |
| Overall evaluation | 40 / 50 |
| | 74 / 100 |
Feedback As instructors, we always face assessment and its limits, including fairness and universality. Therefore, this presentation addresses an important issue. I hope the presenters will also discuss how assessment for online classes is/might be different from face-to-face classes, and how to address related issues.
- Peer review notes査読メモ
Thanks for your submission!
Your proposal has been conditionally accepted.
- For this submission to be fully accepted, please make the requested changes to your abstract/presentation before 2021 Feb 1 (Mon) 23:55.
- When the changes have been made, they will be reviewed and you will be notified of the new acceptance status.