- Original submission元の原稿
発表の題名: A Study of the Recent Increase in Kyoto Institute of Technology (KIT) Laboratory using Moodle after the COVID-19 pandemic
発表の種類: Lightning talk (10 mins) ライトニング・トーク（１０分）
発表の言語: English 英語
発表のキーワード: Laboratory using Moodle, COVID-19
Our main goal of this talk is to briefly analyze the fact that an increasing number of Kyoto Institute of Technology (KIT) Laboratory staff members that have begun using Moodle since 2020, the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Our Moodle has primarily been used by faculty staff members for term/semester lectures. The cases of the Moodle use mentioned above have never happened until the COVID-19 pandemic. For this reason, we have conducted some interviews with laboratory staff members, as it should be meaningful to analyze and discuss the opinions and suggestions from them. We find their Moodle-use can be largely categorized as:
a) Sending messages to participants through announcements activity.
b) Exchanging opinions on their thesis, dissertations plans and presentations.
c) Sharing files and reading materials such as thesis, and scientific journals.
I would like to introduce as many answers and responses as time allows.
- Peer review details査読詳細
Peer Review 1
| Criteria | Assessment |
|---|
| Clarity of Submission | 8 / 10 |
| Presentation Length | 9 / 10 |
| Originality of Submission | 9 / 10 |
| Appropriateness & Relevance to the Moot | 9 / 10 |
| Quality of Content & Writing | 8 / 10 |
| Overall evaluation | 40 / 50 |
| 83 / 100 |
Feedback I recommend removing the line break after the first sentence.
Peer Review 2
| Criteria | Assessment |
|---|
| Clarity of Submission | 8 / 10 |
| Presentation Length | 6 / 10 |
| Originality of Submission | 10 / 10 |
| Appropriateness & Relevance to the Moot | 10 / 10 |
| Quality of Content & Writing | 8 / 10 |
| Overall evaluation | 40 / 50 |
| 82 / 100 |
Feedback It would be great to gain insights from these interviews indeed, but I doubt that 10mins would be enough time to introduce the data and consider its implications going forward. I suggest switching to a 20min or even 40 min presentation slot.
Peer Review 3
| Criteria | Assessment |
|---|
| Clarity of Submission | 8 / 10 |
| Presentation Length | 10 / 10 |
| Originality of Submission | 7 / 10 |
| Appropriateness & Relevance to the Moot | 8 / 10 |
| Quality of Content & Writing | 8 / 10 |
| Overall evaluation | 40 / 50 |
| 81 / 100 |
- Peer review notes査読メモ
Thanks for your submission!
Your proposal has been conditionally accepted.
- For this submission to be fully accepted, please make the requested changes to your abstract/presentation before 2022 Jan 22 (Sat) 23:55.
- When the changes have been made, they will be reviewed and you will be notified of the new acceptance status.