- Original submission元の原稿
Presentation title: Project Bluesky: A collaboratively built BigBlueButton cluster
Presentation type: Presentation (40 mins) プレゼンテーション（４０分）
Presentation language: English 英語
Presentation keywords: BigBlueButton, Scalelite, Cluster
Presentation abstract: Project Bluesky is a cluster of BigBlueButton servers connected by a Scalelite load balancer that was collaboratively built in response to Covid19 and the increased need for online teaching. Inspired by Moodlemoot Japan 2020 which was moved online using BigBlueButton days before it started, project lead Thom Rawson started work on a collaborative project, that would come to be known as “Bluesky. ” Prof. Rawson setup a Scalelite server as a load balancer and invited others to join the project, adding their BBB nodes to the project, enabling all participants to benefit from peakload capacity sharing. The key component of the cluster was the load balancer, which unlike standard load balancers, must be smart in sending users to the servers in which their BigBlueButton room is hosted. A simple round-robin style load balancer will not work, and so Project Bluesky implements the Scalelite load balancer. This presentation will describe the story of how Project Bluesky came to be, the challenges that needed to be overcome in creating a BigBlueButton cluster using Scalelite, and the lessons we learned throughout this experience that will hopefully be useful for anyone considering a similar project in the future.
- Peer review details査読詳細
Peer Review 1
| Criteria | Assessment |
|---|
| Clarity of Submission | 7 / 10 |
| Presentation Length | 9 / 10 |
| Originality of Submission | 10 / 10 |
| Appropriateness & Relevance to the Moot | 10 / 10 |
| Quality of Content & Writing | 8 / 10 |
| Overall evaluation | 45 / 50 |
| 89 / 100 |
Feedback For some readers of this abstract, there is not enough information regarding how Project Bluesky can be used by teachers. That may prevent some people from attending.
Peer Review 2
| Criteria | Assessment |
|---|
| Clarity of Submission | 8 / 10 |
| Presentation Length | 8 / 10 |
| Originality of Submission | 9 / 10 |
| Appropriateness & Relevance to the Moot | 9 / 10 |
| Quality of Content & Writing | 8 / 10 |
| Overall evaluation | 45 / 50 |
| 87 / 100 |
Feedback This sounds like a rather technical presentation, so I worry about the accessibility for the general audience. Nevertheless, as a topic, it certainly fits the conference. suggested corrections: project lead er started work ing on
- Peer review notes査読メモ
Thanks for your submission!
Your proposal has been conditionally accepted.
- For this submission to be fully accepted, please make the requested changes to your abstract/presentation before 2021 Feb 1 (Mon) 23:55.
- When the changes have been made, they will be reviewed and you will be notified of the new acceptance status.