- Presentation abstract発表の要約
The Moodle database is powerful tool for collecting and sharing student data, but is often overlooked because of its unfriendly user interface. This presentation will provide an overview of a customized Moodle database that can be used for peer assessment of presentations or group work. The peer assessment database allows students to easily share peer feedback with either live in-class tasks or with online tasks. A sample database template will be shared to easily allow teachers to set up their own peer assessment database for class use. The database template contains a scoring rubric and comment fields that allow students to share individualized feedback with classmates and the teacher. The presenter will explain how to edit the sample peer evaluation database template, how to share peer data, and how to download the data from the database. Finally, sample usage scenarios and user data will be provided.
- Original submission元の原稿
発表の題名: Moodle Presentation Feedback Database
発表の種類: Presentation (20 mins) プレゼンテーション（２０分）
発表の言語: English 英語
発表のキーワード: Moodle database presentation feedback
The Moodle database is powerful tool for collecting and sharing student data, but is often overlooked because of its unfriendly user interface. This presentation will provide an overview of a customized Moodle database that can be used for peer assessment of presentations or group work. The peer assessment database allows students to easily share peer feedback with either live in-class tasks or with online tasks. A sample database template will be shared to easily allow teachers to set up their own peer assessment database for class use. The database template contains a scoring rubric and comment fields that allow students to share individualized feedback with classmates and the teacher. The presenter will explain how to edit the sample peer evaluation database template, how to share peer data, and how to download the data from the database. Finally, sample usage scenarios and user data will be provided.
- Peer review details査読詳細
Peer Review 1
| Criteria | Assessment |
|---|
| Clarity of Submission | 7 / 10 |
| Presentation Length | 7 / 10 |
| Originality of Submission | 8 / 10 |
| Appropriateness & Relevance to the Moot | 8 / 10 |
| Quality of Content & Writing | 7 / 10 |
| Overall evaluation | 40 / 50 |
| | 77 / 100 |
Feedback A 20-minute presentation seems short for all the elements the author indicates to present about. Try to focus on some rather than rush through the presentation.
Peer Review 2
| Criteria | Assessment |
|---|
| Clarity of Submission | 8 / 10 |
| Presentation Length | 9 / 10 |
| Originality of Submission | 8 / 10 |
| Appropriateness & Relevance to the Moot | 9 / 10 |
| Quality of Content & Writing | 9 / 10 |
| Overall evaluation | 45 / 50 |
| | 88 / 100 |
Feedback This will be useful to those who desire to get more from the Moodle database module.
Peer Review 3
| Criteria | Assessment |
|---|
| Clarity of Submission | 8 / 10 |
| Presentation Length | 7 / 10 |
| Originality of Submission | 7 / 10 |
| Appropriateness & Relevance to the Moot | 9 / 10 |
| Quality of Content & Writing | 8 / 10 |
| Overall evaluation | 40 / 50 |
| | 79 / 100 |
Feedback I recommend this proposal. However, the length of the presentation (20 minutes) might be too short to explain all the nuances of this project. I recommend a 40-minute to allow for more details and more time for Q& A at the end.
- Peer review notes査読メモ
Thanks for your submission!
Your proposal has been conditionally accepted.
- For this submission to be fully accepted, please make the requested changes to your abstract/presentation before 2022 Jan 22 (Sat) 23:55.
- When the changes have been made, they will be reviewed and you will be notified of the new acceptance status.