- Presentation abstract発表の要約
There are few collaboration tools in Moodle that enable teachers have students collaborate in the course in real time.
Teachers have been forced to use things outside of Moodle, like Padlet, Google Docs, OneDrive or whiteboard tools like Miro, or the whiteboards in virtual classrooms
All of these have one major issue that they are outside of Moodle - so the content does not stay part of the course, and some like whiteboards in virtual classrooms are temporary and do not get saved, for future reference.
From a teaching perspective there is no anonymous forums for Moodle - something the community and teachers have been looking for more than a decade. Anonymous submissions (between students) enable the students to partake in a discussion and have their suggestion, contribution stand by itself with less bias from other students.
So, Board was started as a project between Brickfield Education labs and a University in Ireland - Dublin City University (DCU) to explore how this could work. Funded initially by DCU and Brickfield this project has been co-funded by AIT (now Technology University of the Shannon, and UCL - University College London).
Board itself works as a simple post-it board within Moodle, Teachers add columns that posts can be placed under, and students contribute posts to whichever column that is appropriate. Posts can consist of text, a url, image or YouTube video. Posts can be set to be rated by a simple star option, without the students knowing who posted as the names are never visible to students. For classroom management purposes, the teacher can produce a report on who submitted what post.
Board was released midsummer 2021, and since then is translated into ten languages. It has (by end of October) nearly five hundred sites using it, with 835 downloads from the plugin database. It was featured on moodle.com blog as a featured plugin.
With more funding coming from Brickfield, and other institutions Board will continue to grow in features in the coming year.
- Original submission元の原稿
発表の題名: Using a Postit-Board for Student Collaboraion in Moodle
発表の種類: Presentation (20 mins) プレゼンテーション(20分)
発表の言語: English 英語
発表のキーワード: Board, Post-it,
There are few collaboration tools in Moodle that enable teachers have students collaborate in the course in real time.
Teachers have been forced to use things outside of Moodle, like Padlet, Google Docs, OneDrive or whiteboard tools like Miro, or the whiteboards in virtual classrooms
All of these have one major issue that they are outside of Moodle - so the content does not stay part of the course, and some like whiteboards in virtual classrooms are temporary and do not get saved, for future reference.
From a teaching perspective there is no anonymous forums for Moodle - something the community and teachers have been looking for more than a decade. Anonymous submissions (between students) enable the students to partake in a discussion and have their suggestion, contribution stand by itself with less bias from other students.
So, Board was started as a project between Brickfield Education labs and a University in Ireland - Dublin City University (DCU) to explore how this could work. Funded initially by DCU and Brickfield this project has been co-funded by AIT (now Technology University of the Shannon, and UCL - University College London).
Board itself works as a simple post-it board within Moodle, Teachers add columns that posts can be placed under, and students contribute posts to whichever column that is appropriate. Posts can consist of text, a url, image or YouTube video. Posts can be set to be rated by a simple star option, without the students knowing who posted as the names are never visible to students. For classroom management purposes, the teacher can produce a report on who submitted what post.
Board was released midsummer 2021, and since then is translated into ten languages. It has (by end of October) nearly five hundred sites using it, with 835 downloads from the plugin database. It was featured on moodle.com blog as a featured plugin.
With more funding coming from Brickfield, and other institutions Board will continue to grow in features in the coming year.
- Peer review details査読詳細
Peer Review 1
Criteria | Assessment |
---|
Clarity of Submission | 7 / 10 |
Presentation Length | 7 / 10 |
Originality of Submission | 7 / 10 |
Appropriateness & Relevance to the Moot | 7 / 10 |
Quality of Content & Writing | 5 / 10 |
Overall evaluation | 35 / 50 |
| 68 / 100 |
Feedback The description should be between 150 and 200 words. This is 332. There is a lot of explanation of what the tool is, but information on how the collaboration is supposed to work is somewhat limited.
Peer Review 2
Criteria | Assessment |
---|
Clarity of Submission | 8 / 10 |
Presentation Length | 6 / 10 |
Originality of Submission | 8 / 10 |
Appropriateness & Relevance to the Moot | 8 / 10 |
Quality of Content & Writing | 1 / 10 |
Overall evaluation | 30 / 50 |
| 61 / 100 |
Feedback While the topic sounds interesting, the abstract needs to be improved. It should be a more concise single paragraph. It is too long for a 20-minutes presentation. There are also punctuation and capitalization mistakes in it that need to be fixed.
Peer Review 3
Criteria | Assessment |
---|
Clarity of Submission | 8 / 10 |
Presentation Length | 9 / 10 |
Originality of Submission | 10 / 10 |
Appropriateness & Relevance to the Moot | 10 / 10 |
Quality of Content & Writing | 8 / 10 |
Overall evaluation | 40 / 50 |
| 85 / 100 |
Feedback Though I understand what you are talking about showcasing, it would be nice if you could be a little more specific as to what you are going to do in the session. Is this just a showcase of the plugin? Is it free-of-charge? Will any specific uses of it be shown? What content areas can it be used in? A little more detail would be appreciated.
- Peer review notes査読メモ
Thanks for your submission!
Your proposal has been conditionally accepted.
- For this submission to be fully accepted, please make the requested changes to your abstract/presentation before 2022 Jan 22 (Sat) 23:55.
- When the changes have been made, they will be reviewed and you will be notified of the new acceptance status.