- Presentation abstract発表の要約
This presentation will give the status of the Database Enhancement Project, funded by a Moodle Association of Japan (MAJ) grant in 2020, and the top vote-getter in the Moodle Users Association Project Development Cycle: January-June 2021. It is now February 2022, so how close is the project to being finished? How many of the features and improvements have or will be implemented?
The presentation will also look at the Moodle Users Association (MUA) and its role in improving Moodle with its Project Development Cycles. In addition, it will cover the steps in submitting a project to the MUA and the responsibilities of the project manager if the project gets the most votes from the MUA members.
- Original submission元の原稿
発表の題名: Database Enhancement Project update and an explanation of the Moodle Users Association Project Development Cycle
発表の種類: Presentation (20 mins) プレゼンテーション(20分)
発表の言語: English 英語
発表のキーワード: Database enhancement project, project development cycle
This presentation will give the status of the Database Enhancement Project, funded by a Moodle Association of Japan (MAJ) grant in 2020, and the top vote-getter in the Moodle Users Association Project Development Cycle: January-June 2021. It is now February 2022, so how close is the project to being finished? How many of the features and improvements have or will be implemented?
The presentation will also look at the Moodle Users Association (MUA) and its role in improving Moodle with its Project Development Cycles. In addition, it will cover the steps in submitting a project to the MUA and the responsibilities of the project manager if the project gets the most votes from the MUA members.
- Peer review details査読詳細
Peer Review 1
Criteria | Assessment |
---|
Clarity of Submission | 9 / 10 |
Presentation Length | 9 / 10 |
Originality of Submission | 6 / 10 |
Appropriateness & Relevance to the Moot | 9 / 10 |
Quality of Content & Writing | 8 / 10 |
Overall evaluation | 30 / 50 |
| 71 / 100 |
Feedback This is a useful and necessary submission but what if I knew nothing about the Database Enhancement Project? It would be nice to have a bit more detail included so the reader is familiar with the project and knows what to expect from the update.
Peer Review 2
Criteria | Assessment |
---|
Clarity of Submission | 7 / 10 |
Presentation Length | 8 / 10 |
Originality of Submission | 9 / 10 |
Appropriateness & Relevance to the Moot | 10 / 10 |
Quality of Content & Writing | 8 / 10 |
Overall evaluation | 40 / 50 |
| 82 / 100 |
Feedback It would be beneficial to attendees not familiar with the Database Enhancement Project to provide a quick summary of it.
Peer Review 3
Criteria | Assessment |
---|
Clarity of Submission | 10 / 10 |
Presentation Length | 10 / 10 |
Originality of Submission | 10 / 10 |
Appropriateness & Relevance to the Moot | 10 / 10 |
Quality of Content & Writing | 10 / 10 |
Overall evaluation | 50 / 50 |
| 100 / 100 |
Feedback Definitely looking forward to getting an update on this as I'm also looking forward to a more useable database module.
- Peer review notes査読メモ
Thanks for your submission!
Your proposal has been conditionally accepted.
- For this submission to be fully accepted, please make the requested changes to your abstract/presentation before 2022 Jan 22 (Sat) 23:55.
- When the changes have been made, they will be reviewed and you will be notified of the new acceptance status.