- Presentation abstract発表の要約
In large online classes, it can be challenging for an instructor to make a personal connection with students when using Zoom or BigBlueButton, especially when students refuse to turn on their cameras. How can an instructor start to put names to faces in this environment? One way is to have the students make a self-introduction video using the Moodle database module. This lightning round will go through the steps in creating the database, and possible problems an instructor might encounter.
- Original submission元の原稿
Presentation title: Student self-introduction videos using the Moodle Database Module
Presentation type: Lightning talk (10 mins) ライトニング・トーク（１０分）
Presentation language: English 英語
Presentation keywords: database module, self-introduction videos.
In large online classes, it can be challenging for an instructor to make a personal connection with students when using Zoom or BigBlueButton, especially when students refuse to turn on their cameras. How can an instructor start to put names to faces in this environment? One way is to have the students make a self-introduction video using the Moodle database module. This lightning round will go through the steps in creating the database, and possible problems an instructor might encounter.
- Peer review details査読詳細
Peer Review 1
| Criteria | Assessment |
|---|
| Clarity of Submission | 9 / 10 |
| Presentation Length | 7 / 10 |
| Originality of Submission | 8 / 10 |
| Appropriateness & Relevance to the Moot | 8 / 10 |
| Quality of Content & Writing | 9 / 10 |
| Overall evaluation | 45 / 50 |
| 86 / 100 |
Feedback This is a neat idea that many of us have been implementing in one way or another, but having a lightning talk that takes us through the steps and possible issues sounds like a plan.
Peer Review 2
| Criteria | Assessment |
|---|
| Clarity of Submission | 8 / 10 |
| Presentation Length | 8 / 10 |
| Originality of Submission | 8 / 10 |
| Appropriateness & Relevance to the Moot | 7 / 10 |
| Quality of Content & Writing | 7 / 10 |
| Overall evaluation | 40 / 50 |
| 78 / 100 |
Feedback In the last sentence, the presenter refers to the presentation as a "lightning round". It would be better to change this to "Lightning talk".
Peer Review 3
| Criteria | Assessment |
|---|
| Clarity of Submission | 9 / 10 |
| Presentation Length | 9 / 10 |
| Originality of Submission | 8 / 10 |
| Appropriateness & Relevance to the Moot | 8 / 10 |
| Quality of Content & Writing | 8 / 10 |
| Overall evaluation | 40 / 50 |
| 82 / 100 |
- Peer review notes査読メモ
Thanks for your submission!
Your proposal has been conditionally accepted.
- For this submission to be fully accepted, please make the requested changes to your abstract/presentation before 2022 Jan 22 (Sat) 23:55.
- When the changes have been made, they will be reviewed and you will be notified of the new acceptance status.